Posts

running a Tea stall for the last ten years by raising a tin shed (bunk) adjacent to the Bus Stop at Sangam Road and eking out his livelihood. He is a land less poor person. While so the 2nd respondent issued the impugned notice dated 31.07.2021 to the petitioner stating that the Gram Panchayat land was occupied and the shop was constructed, hence vacate the same otherwise action will be initiated under Section 98 of A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1984.=petitioner also gave a representation to the 2nd respondent on 03.08.2021 informing that the tea shop is situated leaving the road margin and margin from the Bus stop also, he is paying taxes to the 2nd respondent and it is not obstructing any passage or required for any road widening purpose. Similar representation is given to the 3rd and 4th respondents on 04.08.2021. But in vain.-respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 03.08.2021 within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. Till such disposal of the said representation of the petitioner by the 2 nd respondent there shall not be any dispossession of the petitioner from running the said Tea stall. Any dispossession of the petitioner and removal of the said tea stall shall be in accordance with law.

writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents in awarding less marks in practicals of final year MBBS Part-II examination held during March 2021 and thereby failing the petitioners in final year MBBS Part-II as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the guidelines for MBBS courses and syllabus prescribed by 2nd respondent University and also violative of Articles 14, 16 & 21 of Constitution of India = In similar circumstances, the Hon’ble Apex Court, vide order dated 18.06.2021 in W.P.(Civil) No.631/2021, while declining the prayer of the petitioners therein, who were final Post Graduate medical students, to waive their examinations and to promote them as Senior Residents and to the Post Doctoral level, held thus: “3. The petitioners have also questioned advisories regarding post graduate courses/examinations issued by the National Medical Commission being Annexures P3 and P4 to the writ petition and in effect sought orders of this Court directing the Respondent authorities to make relaxations in norms and criteria fixed as per policy decision in relation to medical education at the post graduate stage. It is impermissible for Courts exercising powers under Article 32 and/or Article 226 of the Constitution of India to interfere with or regulate policy matters or to sit in appeal therefrom.” So, at the outset this writ petition itself is not maintainable. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that even if all the allegations are taken on its face value, the aforementioned offences are not attracted. Even as per the complaint, it is with the consent of complainant they had sexual intercourse, Section 376 IPC has no application. He submits that Sections 3(1)(w)(i) and 3(2)(v) of SC&ST (POA) Act are also not attracted because in this case complainant herself has stated that she voluntarily went to A-1 and gave consent for intercourse and there is no allegation of abuse in the name of caste. He further submits that earlier basing on whatsapp message sent by her to a third person, which was received by Sub Inspector of Police, on suomoto he has registered the complaint with similar allegations. When 164 Cr.P.C statement of the victim was recorded, the de facto complainant stated that she has not made such allegations.-Taking into consideration the present report and the earlier report given by the complainant, prima facie it appears that the alleged offences are not attracted against the petitioner. Hence, this Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner.

presence at the scene of offence,=deceased took cool drink in his shop and, thereafter, the incident in question took place. If that is so, the post-mortem certificate issued by PW14 vide Ex.P7 should give an indication of the presence of some liquid in the stomach, but the said report is otherwise. Therefore, the inconsistencies in the evidence of PW1, PW2, PW6 and PW7 throw any amount of doubt with regard to their presence at the scene of offence, at the time of incident.;presence of street lights = Ex.P5 is the scene observation report, which was prepared by the investigating officer in the presence of PW13. This document does not show existence of street lights at the scene. Even PW13 and PW17 did not clearly say about the existence of street lights or electrical poles at the scene of offence, which create a doubt as to the presence of street lights and PW1 and PW2 witnessing the incident with the help of street lights.;recovery of M.O.1 = On one hand, PW1 and PW2 deposed that M.O.1 was taken away by the accused along with him after attacking the deceased, but some speak about recovery of M.O.1 at the scene pursuant to the arrest of the accused. In view of the above, the recovery of M.O.1 at the instance of A1, cannot be believed. Apart from that, there is no evidence that the blood found on M.O.1 is that of the deceased, leave alone matching of blood group.- The conviction and sentence recorded against the appellant/accused No. 1 in the Judgment, dated 21.03.2014, in Sessions Case No. 71 of 2012 on the file of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur, for the offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C., is set- aside and he is acquitted for the said offence

The Panguluri Seetammagari Arya Vysya Dharma Satram, which was the owner of certain extents of land in Sy.Nos.296 and 302 of Tirupati village, had initiated eviction proceedings against the persons, who were in possession of the said land. This litigation resulted in O.A.No.23 of 2003 being filed before the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments Kurnool, which came to be allowed on 09.07.2003 ordering eviction of the persons in possession of the said lands. = Directions are given, only by way of clarification, to ensure compliance of the earlier directions of this Court: 1) All those persons, who are said to be in possession of the house/house site in the aforesaid Ac.42.52 cents of land in Sy.Nos.296 and 302 of Tirupati, are permitted to make applications to the Assistant Commissioner of Endowments within a period of three weeks from today, along with all relevant documents and papers.2) At the end of the aforesaid three weeks time, the Assistant Commissioner Endowments shall forward all these applications to the committee, which has already been formed. This exercise shall be completed within one week from the end of the three week period mentioned above. 3) Upon receipt of such applications, the committee shall undertake the exercise of verifying as to who are eligible candidates and the cases of those persons whose applications are being rejected. 4) Once the said two lists are prepared, the respondents shall act strictly in accordance with the directions given by this Court in W.P.No.15138 and 16400 of 2009. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

Reservations in out sourcing services in resepct of Hindu Temples = As the Circulars and Government Orders relate to outsourcing employees in the Government organizations, and the temples and the Hindu religious institutions are not Government organizations, they cannot be brought under the purview of the Andhra Pradesh Corporation for Outsourced Services.= held that the Circulars and Government Orders issued by the Government, as mentioned above, must be interpreted to mean that the recruitment of outsourced employees for Hindu Temples and Hindu religious institutions cannot be done through APCOS and the rule of reservation in its entirety cannot be applied to recruitment of such outsourced employees. However, the said rule of reservation shall continue to apply even where such recruitment was done through other agencies to the extent of accommodating depressed classes of the society where members of such classes of society profess the Hindu faith.

right of an accused to have his bail application heard by the Court within a reasonable time has been entrenched as a constitutional liberty. At the same time, disposal of bail application without furnishing the order copy within a reasonable time will not place the accused in a better position. Mere emphasizing that an accused has an indefeasible fundamental right to bail itself is not sufficient without furnishing the copy of the order. -GUIDE LINES ISSUED

freedom of voting is a part of the freedom of expression. It is further observed that secrecy of casting vote is necessary for strengthening democracy. It is further observed that in direct elections of Lok Sabha or State Legislature, maintenance of secrecy is a must and is insisted upon all over the world in democracies where direct elections are involved to ensure that a voter casts his vote without any fear or being victimised if his vote is disclosed. It is further observed that democracy and free elections are a part of the basic structure of the Constitution. It is also further observed that the election is a mechanism which ultimately represents the will of the people. The essence of the electoral system should be to ensure freedom of voters to exercise their free choice. Therefore, any attempt of booth capturing and/or bogus voting should be dealt with iron hands because it ultimately affects the rule of law and democracy. Nobody can be permitted to dilute the right to free and fair election.